BUCHAREST, Romania — After receiving distressed text messages from a young man worried about the conditions his friend was living in at a social care home in central Romania, Georgiana Pascu arranged an impromptu visit to inspect the facility.
A malnourished child lies on an improvised bed in the basement of a care home July 27 in the village of Bardesti in central Romania.
“In the beginning, we were quite sure there is nothing there,” said Pascu, program manager at the Center for Legal Resources, a rights group. She said that a day earlier, state authorities had carried out an inspection of the care home for older and disabled people, and no issues had been flagged.
But what she and her colleagues uncovered at the care home in the village of Bardesti, she said, was “outrageous … inhuman.”
“There was a very young woman who looked malnourished, she didn’t move, she didn’t speak at all — she was lying on the basement floor,” she told The Associated Press. “There was another young woman, she was crying and asking for water.”
People are also reading…
The nongovernmental organization discovered six residents in late July living in the Little House of Min’s cluttered, dingy basement surrounded by construction materials in addition to 23 people living on the floors above. Four residents with severe disabilities were lying on mattresses “soiled with feces, urine, and blood, with flies on them,” they said, who “couldn’t defend themselves and couldn't ask for help.”
The team of three from the Center for Legal Resources immediately called the emergency services, and police and ambulance crews arrived, but even they called for backup, Pascu said. Hours later, a resident directed Pascu to what she describes as a small “secluded room … with just a bed inside” where two residents lived with “no artificial or natural light.”
A bed is placed in a bathroom at a care home July 27 in the village of Bardesti in central Romania.
The NGO’s findings triggered a judicial investigation and follow similar discoveries in other private institutions. So far, two Cabinet members were forced to resign over what Romanian media have dubbed the “horror homes” scandal.
The discovery is just the latest in a string of disturbing revelations that have made front-page news in the local media, spotlighting the impact corruption can have on the socially vulnerable in Romania, which joined the European Union in 2007.
One of the main conditions of Romania’s accession to the EU was that it crack down on endemic corruption, but it remains one of the bloc’s most corrupt members, according to Transparency International.
In early July, police raids at three separate care homes in Ilfov County near Bucharest also uncovered widespread abuse and neglect of older and disabled people. Images emerged of residents tied to beds in filthy rooms, some exhibiting signs of physical abuse and appearing rake-thin.
In those cases, Romania’s anti-organized crime agency, DIICOT, said that two organized criminal gangs accused of human trafficking and other charges were formed in 2020 to “exploit people with disabilities or in vulnerable situations.” Prosecutors said residents were subjected to unpaid labor via acts of coercion as well as physical violence, and weren't given enough food.
Prosecutors launched a criminal investigation and said there are more than 20 suspects in the case.
DIICOT detained three people after the findings at the Little House of Min, which it alleges formed a criminal gang in 2020 “to commit the crime of human trafficking,” and that residents were subjected to “inhumane and degrading treatment” through acts of physical and mental aggression.
Residents were being exploited under the guise of an association that withheld their state benefits payments or sums sent to them by friends and relatives, prosecutors said. Instead of the money going toward the residents’ care, it was mainly used “for the benefit of the members of the group.”
Two local officials were fired over the findings and the authorities shuttered the home.
The AP contacted the young man who had raised concerns to Pascu about the Little House of Min, but he wasn’t authorized to talk because he’s considered a victim in the legal case.
Doru Constantin, a spokesperson from Mures County social services, confirmed to the AP that the Little House of Min was checked by inspectors a day before the NGO’s discovery, but said they didn’t find anything “because they didn't have access to the basement of the building.”
“I can’t believe even now something like this could happen in our county,” he added.
President Klaus Iohannis has called the revelations a “national disgrace” and said measures must be taken to “cut evil from the roots.”
One of the Ilfov care home bosses, DIICOT alleges, was squandering residents’ money on prostitutes, drugs and parties. He is also being investigated for abuse of office by the National Anti-Corruption Directorate, which is also investigating two social inspectors for corruption who carried out favorable checks on his home in May.
Family Minister Gabriela Firea, who is reported to have close ties to that care home boss, was forced to resign amid the sprawling scandal, as was Labor Minister Marius Budai. They both denied knowledge of care homes’ woes.
Alin Mituta, a Romanian legislator at the European Parliament, asked the European Commission in July if it planned to investigate Romania’s abusive care homes issue, which he said directly violated the bloc’s Charter of Fundamental Rights. The responsible Romanian authorities, Mituta said, “were made aware of these issues … but no action was taken.”
European Commission spokesperson Anitta Hipper said in a statement sent to the AP on Wednesday that the Commission is “deeply concerned by this case as there is no place for mistreatment of vulnerable people in the EU,” adding it can't comment on ongoing investigations.
Prime Minister Marcel Ciolacu expressed gratitude last week to the NGOs that “exposed abuses in the welfare system."
“It is obvious that the Romanian state needs help,” he said. “We need to close this chapter of abuse.”
The history of how roads are built, and what future construction may look like
The history of how roads are built, and what future construction may look like
We've come a long way from what are thought to be the first constructed roads on earth, streets paved with mud bricks and bitumen built in Mesopotamia around 4000 B.C. Today, there are more than 4 million miles of finished roads across the U.S.—enough to circle the Earth 160 times.
In between, society has seen considerable developments: from asphalt to concrete, private projects to federally funded efforts, and beyond. And these leaps aren't just in the field of construction, either. Improved roads mean an improved society. They help facilitate an economic and social connection between previously disparate communities and give people access to independence, freedom, and increased opportunity. For instance, after the National Highway System was implemented in the mid-20th century, the country underwent a transformation towards suburbanization, during which 70% of Americans were able to own a home for the first time, leading to the birth of the American middle class.
However, our current system is long overdue for a major overhaul. Currently, the U.S. ranks 17th worldwide in road quality and 1 in 5 miles of highways or major roads are in poor condition. Our old methods of construction aren't holding up against an increasingly mobile society, and with gas tax revenue falling, the funding to improve is evaporating quickly.
This means that engineers, federal agencies, and urban planners alike are working on some exciting alternatives. Whether it be ultra-high-performance concrete or nature-informed coastal highway designs, roads will be built quite differently than we are used to in the very near future.
The General compiled historical information, government data, and university research to show how roads have been an integral part of connecting people and cultures and how construction has changed over time. Read on to find out how we arrived at our current road construction system and how it may change sooner than we think.
Past: The foundation of the road systems
Perhaps the first modern roads were the work of Thomas Telford and John Loudon McAdam, two Scottish engineers working in the 19th century. Their work set the precedent for many construction norms, including raising the road's foundation to improve water drainage and laying smaller stones over a foundational layer of hard, broken stones wedged tightly together, known as macadam.
Around the same time, in 1824, Paris' Champs-Élysées was laid over with asphalt, setting an example that would be greatly expanded in 1852 by the paving of a roadway connecting Paris to Perpignan (some 800 kilometers). The United States would soon follow suit paving roads using asphalt concrete, the first completed in Newark, New Jersey, in 1870.
By the 20th century, an increasing number of cars and trucks led to a nationwide demand for more improved and expansive road systems, leading to the first federally funded road construction projects. As the number of cars traversing American roadways boomed, so did the roads themselves: While in 1904 one-sixth of rural roads had paved surfacing, by 1935 this number jumped to more than one-third, the weaving of a road network beginning to take shape.
In 1921, Congress passed the Federal Highway Act, providing funds to pave state roads, though the act was not quite the expansive investment advocates of a national highway system wanted. The act limited federal aid to only 7% of roads in any given state and stipulated that three-sevenths of federally supported roads be "interstate in character."
It was not until the advent of the National Highway System, which first began developing in 1941 amidst World War II under President Franklin D. Roosevelt, that a comprehensive national road network truly began to flourish. When President Eisenhower picked up the project following his election in 1952, construction accelerated rapidly. While the first funding for the NHS was authorized as early as 1952, the sheer magnitude of constructing such a wide-ranging infrastructure project was outside the means of the federal and state-level government, and thus the first portions of highway built were toll roads.
The passage of the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956 finally, truly, hit the gas on highway expansion, solidifying the creation of 41,000 miles of interstate highway in the single largest public works program in U.S. history at that time. The act also laid out design standards for national highways, including ensuring that roads were made with materials equipped to handle vehicle speeds of 50 to 70 mph, with at least two 12-foot-wide travel lanes and a paved left and right shoulder.
Present: An enormous investment in resources
Today, while materials specs vary slightly, interstate highways continue to be built and rehabilitated by much the same process and with similar materials as those outlined by the U.S. Geological Survey in its 2006 fact sheet on interstate materials use. Interstate construction consists of three main components: a base of compacted soil, followed by a thick sublayer of natural aggregate—which is a mixture of sand, gravel, and crushed stone—and finally a thick "lift" of concrete pavement, often ranging from 9 inches to 1 foot in depth.
One final aspect, a road's "wearing course," which is the top inch of pavement on which vehicle tires meet the road surface, can differ depending on several factors, including the region of the country in which the road is located, the particular requirements of the roadway with regard to traffic volume, and climatological patterns.
Whereas concrete can better withstand the punishing weight of heavy traffic such as truck and freight traffic, asphalt can be more resistant to certain types of weather, especially cracking caused by ice. One of the ways in which concrete begins to deteriorate is when ice melts, trapping water below the road surface and causing what is known as delamination, or cracks and flaking of the roadway.
Coastal highways, for example—particularly those in the Pacific Northwest and New England region—often get an asphalt overlay, because of the combination of salty air and the increasing risk of sea level rise. Asphalt tends to be less expensive than concrete and so even though its service life is shorter, it is cheaper and easier to replace—and can often be recycled during reconstruction.
The sheer volume of material that has gone into the National Highway System is staggering. The Federal Highway Administration estimates that the natural aggregate used in the system's construction was equal to 700 of Egypt's largest pyramids and the portland cement concrete used could build 80 Hoover Dams.
As simple as materials like stone, sand, and ash may be, footing their bill has been no small feat: The National Highway Construction Cost Index—which began tracking data in 2003—shows that, over the past two decades, construction costs have nearly tripled. The vast majority of these costs are handled by state and local governments, with federal government assistance dependent on the creation or reauthorization of funding legislation. In 2020, state and local governments put $154 billion into road and bridge work against the federal government's $51 billion, representing a 3 to 1 ratio.
Since the passage of the Federal-Aid Highway Act in 1956, funding for surface transportation projects has traditionally come from the Highway Trust Fund, established that same year. The fund comprises two main branches: the Highway Account, which focuses on constructing and maintaining highways, and the Mass Transit Account, which purchases buses, subways, ferries, and other public transportation vehicles.
Unfortunately, the fund is now in danger of no longer being able to support its objectives, in large part due to falling revenues from the federal tax on gasoline. Approximately 82% of the Highway Trust Fund's revenue comes from the gas tax. However, due to inflation, rising construction costs, and the increasing fuel efficiency of new vehicles, along with the growing popularity of electric and hybrid vehicles, this funding source has begun to come up short.
The federal gas tax has not been increased since 1993, and thus experiences decreased value year over year because it does not keep up with inflation. Many advocates for a gas tax increase have called specifically for a tax that is directly tied to inflation as a means of addressing this problem.
As we move further into the third decade of the 21st century, the biggest concern for civil engineers is making roads more resilient against deterioration due to ever-increasing volumes of traffic—notably truck traffic—as well as the increasing frequency of natural disasters and other extreme weather events as a result of intensifying climate change.
Future: Toward more innovative infrastructure
Perhaps the most significant indicator of what the future of road construction holds is the Bipartisan Infrastructure Act. Also known as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, it was passed by Congress and signed into law by President Biden in November 2021. Under the bill, $110 billion will be invested over five years into repairing nationwide infrastructure, with an emphasis on rebuilding and repairing roads.
In October 2022, the Department of Transportation released $59.9 billion in fiscal apportionments to be distributed across all states for road and bridge improvements in 2023. Among the programs these funds support is the National Highway Performance Program, which has funded over 6,000 individual projects to date to resurface, reconstruct, and improve roads across the country. This funding is arriving at a pivotal time, as electric vehicles grow in popularity, gas consumption—and thus gas tax revenue—is decreasing, and the Highway Trust Fund is projected to run dry by 2028.
So, now that we have a solid federal funding package for the next several years, what will the future of roads and bridges look like and what will they be made of?
One of the most popular developments in new road-building materials has been ultra-high-performance concrete. First developed in the 1980s but not popularized until more recently, UHPC incorporates steel or carbon fiber to provide significantly higher compressive strength than run-of-the-mill concrete—in other words, it gets much stronger much faster, making it more cost-effective, sustainable, and resilient. The use of UHPC in repairing or rehabilitating old roads and bridges is expected to reduce construction time—and along with it cost and emissions from construction vehicles.
The FHWA's Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center is fine-tuning a process called T 365, which measures the deterioration of roads due to deicing salts during winter and can assist in road maintenance. Researchers at the FHWA are also examining the possible benefits of incorporating supplementary cementitious materials into concrete with the possibility of creating less carbon-intensive, more durable cement.
And when it comes to the drivability of American roadways and road safety, technology is taking the lead—from retroreflective pavement markings that make lanes clearer at night, to digital signage that offers real-time traffic information, to roads capable of charging electric cars while they travel. Society has already reached a point where most new vehicles come equipped with some form of automation—be it crash avoidance warning systems, lane-keep assistance, or even assisted driving modes—and road infrastructure must now evolve to make the spatial requirements of these systems more robust.
The IIJA also contains earmarked funds to help with the advent of "smart roads" that meld present road systems with expanded broadband coverage to assist vehicles' lidar (light detecting and ranging), radar, and camera-based systems.
Story editing by Brian Budzynski. Copy editing by Tim Bruns.
This story originally appeared on The General and was produced and distributed in partnership with Stacker Studio.
